In traditional adversarial thinking, A and B are in conflict. Each side seeks to criticize the other point of view. By utilizing Fair and Just Deliberations, Both A and B work together as they explore all sides of an issue. Adversarial confrontation is replaced by a cooperative exploration of the subject.

Unbundling Thinking

When we think in the normal way, we try to do too much at once. We may be looking at the information, forming ideas, and judging someone else’s ideas all at the same time.

“Instead of trying to do everything at once, we separate out the different aspects of thinking. This way we can pay full attention to each aspect in turn.”

Fair and Just Deliberations allow us to unbundle thinking. Instead of trying to do everything at once, we separate out the different aspects of thinking. This way we can pay full attention to each aspect in turn. Think of full-color printing, where the basic color separations are made and then each basic color is printed separately onto the same sheet to give full-color printing. In the same way, we separate the modes of thinking and then apply each mode to the same subject in order to end up with full-color thinking on the subject.

There is a suggestion that the chemical setting in the brain (neurotransmitters, etc.) may be different when we are being positive from when we are being negative and from when we are being creative. If this proves to be so, then there is an absolute need to separate out the different components of thinking in order to do each properly. It would be impossible to have one brain setting that was ideal for all sorts of thinking.

Separating Ego and Performance

“Because the Fair and Just Deliberations program quickly becomes a neutral game, the method provides a very convenient way to switch thinking or to ask for a certain type of thinking.”

If you do not like an idea, then you are not going to spend much time thinking of the benefits or good points of that idea. This is because if you uncovered sufficient good points for the idea to be accepted, then you would have “lost” the argument.

With Fair and Just Deliberations, however, the thinker can be specifically asked to give an unbiased “performance.” This is a challenge to the thinker, who will not want to appear unable to perform this way. So unbiased thinking gets done even by someone who does not like the idea. In the course of this use of Fair and Just Deliberations, ideas may turn up which cause the thinker to change his or her mind.